Showing posts with label U.S. Domestic Policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S. Domestic Policy. Show all posts

Monday, December 20, 2010

She Knows Best....

I heard Michelle Obama is urging everyone to buy Girl Scout Salads for the holidays.....

Animal House Food Fight is a Hate Crime



Most people see this clip from Animal House as hysterically funny; Big Mama Michelle Obama, America's Cafeteria Lady, sees it as a nutritional hate crime.

Big Mama Obama

We can all agree that our public schools are a mess.  But have no fear: Big Mama Michelle Obama is here.  She spearheaded the outrageous childhood nutrition bill that will spend billions of dollars to build SALAD BARS in American public schools.

Hey,  Big Mama Obama, the problem is not what's on the menu in the school cafeteria, the problem is the kids can't read the menu.

But Big Mama Obama knows best.  She knows what we should eat, when and where.  She is a world renown expert on nutrition, and apparently gained that expertise by being married to the divider in chief.

Big Mama says we can't leave it up to parents to tell kids what to eat, instead, we should leave it up to her.

Obviously, the proper role of the federal government when to comes to food is to make sure it is safe.

The government should make sure there is no razor blades in our salt.  After that, its up to us whether to use salt or not.

Think about the insanity: of all the problems with our schools, we are going to spend billions to install salad bars.

Big Mama Obama is the cafeteria lady from hell: she puts the food on your plate whether you want it or not.

She probably sees the Belushi cafeteria scene in "Animal House" as a nutrition hate crime.

 

 

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Barack OLiar

Obama the liar:

"When they expire in two years, I will fight to end them," Obama said. "Just as I suspect the Republican Party may fight to end the middle-class tax cuts that I've championed and that they've opposed."

There is not one Republican ANYWHERE that is on the record as wanting an increase in income taxes for the middle class. Not one. And everyone knows it.  But no one calls him out on it.

Lower taxes is a core principal of the Republican party, much like racial preferences is for the Democrats.

Imagine if a Republican President said: "I will fight for affirmative action for minorities, which the Democratic Party has actively opposed."

The press would say, what the fu*k are you talking about, the Dems are ALWAYS in favor of affirmative action."

The same thing applies to taxes.  

But the press are slient mice on this one.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

The Liberal Position Taxes The Mind

Here is the official liberal position on our tax rates:

1) Bush lowered the rates 10 years ago. That was horrible

2) The Clinton tax rates were higher across the board. That was awesome.

3) They want to go back to the Clinton tax rates-Those were the days!- but....

4) Only for people making over $250,000.  For everyone else the Bush tax rates....

5) Are awesome.

It turns out liberals LOVE the Bush tax rates when it comes to themselves. No one you or I know making less than a $250,000 has said, "I want to pay more federal income taxes.  I want the Clinton tax rates."  

You will sooner see the Jets sack a quarterback than see that happen.

Which begs the question:  If liberals think that the welfare state is underfunded and that higher taxes are the way to go, why are they excluding everyone from under $250k  from paying more taxes?

Isn't it so nice of them, to have OTHER PEOPLE fund there welfare state?

It's so important to fund, but not so important that they pay into it.

10% of the country pays 70% of the taxes.

50% of the country pays nothing.

But they love their Bush tax cuts,,,, when it comes to themselves.



      

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

How To Argue Like A Liberal

You see these liberals are hammering Obama because he compromised on taxes?  Let's be honest: What's driving this is that liberals can't stand the fact that we have a black man in the White House.  Sure they say that their criticism is rooted in his tax policies, but we all know that is a pretext, that they are straight-up racists.

Taxed to Death (And Beyond)

Regarding the death of Elizabeth Edwards, one aspect of the story that will not receive coverage is did the upcoming estate tax play a roll in her decision to stop treatment? 

Right now, the estate tax is zero.  It is scheduled to go up to 55% on January 1, but under the deal Obama just agreed to, it will be 35% for all estates larger than $5 million.

You can't tell me people who are terminally ill and their families are not forced to at least think about the harsh tax consequences that will occur if a person dies on December 31, 2010 as opposed to January 1, 2011.

The fact that Obama & the Congress have let this play out for too long, and that forces people like Elizabeth Edwards (and countless others) to think about the consequences of the government taking none of their cash if they die one day and 55% of their cash if they die just one day later.

No one should have to be put in that situation.

But many Americans are facing that horrible decision-thanks to these grave- robbing liberals.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

High Times With Chris Christie

I just watched Chris Christie talk about signing a medical marijuana bill.  The man is such an awesome speaker, he could have started smoking a SPLIFF in mid speech and conservatives in the audience would have said, "Christie is right about medical marijuana".

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Proof That He Doesn't Smoke Crack Anymore

I see said the blind man.  Marion Barry, current DC Councilman, former Mayor, has co-sponsored a bill that would limit the amount of time you could collect welfare.  Five years and you're out.  If it passes, it would remove 7,000 families from the shackles of government dependency.

Let's welcome Da Mayor to the vast right-wing conspiracy.


A distraction of the road to a better DC welfare system

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

No More Public Housing

Just read in the Times a story on how repair jobs for public housing are years behind schedule and that the backlog is creating dangerous living conditions.  From the Times:

Latoya Craig, 27, an administrative assistant who lives in Moore Houses, in the South Bronx, was recently told that the large hole in her bathroom ceiling would not be repaired until May. In the meantime, mold has started to bloom, causing her to worry about the health of her 6-year-old son.

When you think of the harmful affects that liberal policies inflict upon American citizens, public housing is a good place to examine.

The culture of dependency which occurs when the government supplies your housing is shameful.  That we allow this to happen, and don't take a wrecking ball to these policies is a disgrace.

When government supplies the roof over your head,  the end result is you think the government is responsible to supply all of your basic needs.  And when that happens-you are doomed.

Think about the example above. The woman has a potential hazardous condition in her apartment.  A condition that could hurt her 6-year old son.   She is told it won't be fixed until 9 months from now.

Does she fix it herself?  No.  Does she hire someone to fix it?  No.  Does she move out to another place?  Of course not.  She does not see it as her responsibility to do so.

And why should she?  We have conditioned her to think that she is not responsible for her own housing-so why should she think it's her responsibility to repair that housing?

Dependency crushes the human spirit.

And that is what they are selling-dependency

Monday, October 18, 2010

Frank Talk About Barney

I just read that the guy running against Barney Frank got heckled by Frank's boyfriend.  Like most people, I wondered: which boyfriend?  Was it the guy who got busted for growing pot?  Or was it the one who was convicted of running a male prostitution business out of Frank's apartment?

Frank is the author of the financial reform bill, which is supposed to stop the next financial crisis from occurring.  I know it was written in the Federalist Papers, but I do not know if the author was Hamilton, Madison or Jay.  But it says it somewhere in there that if a Congressman cannot tell that his boyfriend is running a prostitution ring out of his apartment, he also will not be able to recognize when a Wall Street meltdown is about to happen.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

You're Entitled to Shit

Adam Carolla breaks down health care like nobody else.  Check it out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8UhYbokfY0

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Waitng For Pat...

I want to write about Paladino and the gay marriage/gay pride parade issue, but I am predicting that Patrick J Buchanan will do so in his next column, and he will say it better than me.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

He Had To Take It

Obama's Economic Czar Larry Summers is leaving the administration to head back to Harvard. He was offered his dream job and could not turn it down: the Chair of Harvard's "Communist" Department. The only job more prestigious at Harvard is the guy responsible for bolting the doors closed whenever a military recruiter tries to stop by.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Eye On Government


When the leaves begin to turn, I think of three things: (1) playoff baseball; (2) my beloved football Giants; and (3) Joe Paterno's glasses.

Jo Pa's glasses. With lenses so thick, they could be used to bullet- proof the pope mobile. Those lenses can be nationalized as solar panels to heat the entire eastern seaboard.

But I would be remiss if I did not comment on the frames. Joe's lenses get all the love, but no one takes the time to describe the frames.

The frames that Joe uses are very popular.

When you are a member of a government worker's union, you receive free optical care. And every year, you are entitled to one free pair of glasses. And when you go to pick out your pair of glasses, they show you all the frames that you can choose from under your union plan. And those frames, the government union frames, are always the most fucked up looking frames in the store.

And every year, you get to go back to that same vision center and pick up your union-sponsored glasses.

So if you see anyone walking around with the Joe Pa look, just know they are proud members of a government workers union.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Chris Christie Schools A Teacher

This is new, Christie breaks it down like no one else can:

Friday, September 3, 2010

He Has Always Been About The Green

Did you see this story on Jesse Jackson?

Detroit’s Channel 7 reports that the Reverend’s Caddy Escalade SUV was stolen and stripped of its wheels while he was in town last weekend with the UAW’s militant President Bob King leading the “Jobs, Justice, and Peace” march promoting government-funded green jobs.
Read that again: Jackson’s Caddy SUV was stripped while he was in town promoting green jobs.

How awesome.

While the good Reverend was preaching the virtues of "do as I say, not as I do" outside there was a little redistribution of the wealth going on.

Jesse takes the cake.

They may have stripped his car, but Jesse stripped himself of any decency long ago.

From the fake MLK died in my arms story, to the shakedown of corporations unless and until they donated to his organizations, to the kid he had with his mistress, to his hymietown remarks, the man is a moral and ethical disgrace.

But he is a man incapable of shame.

And we are a nation unwilling to shun him.

Here is an excerpt from Jesse's green speech:


We need an economy that creates employment that can't be shipped overseas., Home-grown American labor will be installing windmills and solar panels. A green economy is not an abstract concept.”


Maybe they used the money they got from stripping Jesse's gas guzzler to buy windmills for downtown Detroit.


And maybe the windmill company they start will grow prosperous.

And if it does, they can expect Jesse to come knocking for a donation.

And that my friends, will be the ultimate form of liberal recycling.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

This Judge Was No Hank Aaron

The Stoop thinks it is fitting that A-Fraud hit his 600th homer and the radical San Francisco District Court judge overturned the California gay marriage ban on the same day.

Both results came about through illegitimate means: A-Fraud by taking performance enhancing drugs, and California, by having a single judge dismiss the will of 7 million voters.

A-Fraud's inflated stats and California's newly found constitutional right to gay marriage are also an affront to long-established cherished American institutions: (1) the baseball record book; and (2) heterosexual marriage.

The judge should have had John Sterling read the decision out loud.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

He Gets It

Last week when a federal court gave the Justice Department a preliminary ruling in the Arizona Immigration case, the decision was hailed wide and far by main stream media outlets like the New York Slimes. Yet, yesterday, when a US District Court denied Obama's attempt to throw out Virginia's lawsuit which takes dead aim at the constitutionality of Obamacare-not a word was heard.

US District Judge Henry Hudson on the expansion of the Commerce Clause: the individual mandate "literally forges new ground and extends Commerce Clause powers beyond its current high water mark." Specifically, the court recognized that there is a critical difference between the federal government regulating "a voluntary decision to perform an act" and mandating "that a person ... perform an involuntary act."

Hudson seems to get the central argument: forcing American citizens to buy a stand-alone product is beyond the reach of the Commerce Clause.

Round one is scored by the ringside judges in favor of the Constitution.

A Bunch Of Pricks...

Did you know that under Obamacare, convicted sex offenders can get viagra using taxpayer funds? Senator Coburn introduced an amendment to the bill that would bar "convicted child molesters, rapists and sex offenders" from buying erectile dysfunction drugs with taxpayer money. That amendment was voted down, as only two Democrats in the Senate voted in favor of the amendment.