A lot of people when they go on spring break, they go to South America and get bombed. Obama, the Neo-Bam, went to South America to begin bombing. He did not bother to go to Congress to authorize military action action Libya, nor did he take the time to explain to the American people his rationale.
And after the bombing began, he continued his spring break. You would think that he would shake the hand of the Brazilian leader and say, "Sorry, I gotta split, I just started a war". But if you thought that, you would be wrong. Because Obama's spring break tour continues as he makes his way to Chile.
Don't you find that equal parts odd and irresponsible? And downright weird?
And what about starting a war without getting authorization from Congress?
I thought libs were into the whole voting thing. Rock the Vote. Vote or Die.
Want to turn your liberal friends/associates into as Tommy from Goodfella's would say, "stubling mumbling pricks?" Just quote Obama from 2007, before he turned into Neo-Bam:
The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.
Watch them stumble as they try to reconcile that statement with the Barack O' Neo-Bomber of 2011.
Even Harry Houdini couldn't get out of that bind.
But we don't hear a peep from the anti-war crowd, do we?