The Elena Kagan ("Lady Kaga") confirmation hearings begin this week. Check on the New York Times below, trying to present her judicial philosophy as unknowable:
But while Ms. Kagan’s biography may be clear, her judicial philosophy is not. She has never been a judge,..... experts said senators had few clues to her judicial philosophy, a subject that will be ripe for exploration when the hearings begin.
Her judicial philosophy is not clear? Let's connect the bread crumbs:
Raised on the Upper West Side
Parents were progressive/socialists communists
Went to Harvard
Wrote her thesis on Socialism in NYC during the 1930's (The paper was probably entitled "The Good Old Days")
Clerked for Thurgood Marshall
Press Secretary for liberal witch Liz Holtzman
Worked for Bill Clinton
Dean at Harvard
Threw the military off campus
Solicitor General for El- Comandante Obama
That is a real blank slate we are working off of- right? If you had to build a super liberal using stem cell research, you could not come up with the DNA to match Lady Kaga's resume.
OJ left less clues than Lady Kaga. And The Times expects people to believe that there are few clues to her judicial philosophy?